<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunder vs. iPhone: Experience not Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dalelarson.com/2008/05/thunder-vs-iphone-experience-not-features.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dalelarson.com/2008/05/thunder-vs-iphone-experience-not-features.html</link>
	<description>Adventures in Startups: Business, Leadership, Technology and Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 04:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: free satellite channels</title>
		<link>http://dalelarson.com/2008/05/thunder-vs-iphone-experience-not-features.html/comment-page-1#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>free satellite channels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailylarson.com/?p=14#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>Development of digital technologies occurs prompt rates. Does not lag behind progress and digital TV. Speaking about digital TV, we first of all mean satellite TV. The digital satellite TV becomes more and more accessible to simple users. The market paid satellite tv also is not necessary on a place. The new digital standard of TV of high clearness HDTV actively develops and takes root. The satellite TV becomes more and more directed on the spectator. Besides digital quality of the image, advantage of satellite systems also is also the extensive cover zone of the companion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Development of digital technologies occurs prompt rates. Does not lag behind progress and digital TV. Speaking about digital TV, we first of all mean satellite TV. The digital satellite TV becomes more and more accessible to simple users. The market paid satellite tv also is not necessary on a place. The new digital standard of TV of high clearness HDTV actively develops and takes root. The satellite TV becomes more and more directed on the spectator. Besides digital quality of the image, advantage of satellite systems also is also the extensive cover zone of the companion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone vs. Blackberry: Touchscreen no substitute for good user experience : Dale Larson</title>
		<link>http://dalelarson.com/2008/05/thunder-vs-iphone-experience-not-features.html/comment-page-1#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone vs. Blackberry: Touchscreen no substitute for good user experience : Dale Larson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailylarson.com/?p=14#comment-303</guid>
		<description>[...] A new study of user satisfaction thirty days after purchase confirms what some have been saying all along (see previous post Storm vs. iPhone: Experience not Features). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A new study of user satisfaction thirty days after purchase confirms what some have been saying all along (see previous post Storm vs. iPhone: Experience not Features). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackberry Storm vs. iPhone: Similar Experience or Disaster? : Dale Larson</title>
		<link>http://dalelarson.com/2008/05/thunder-vs-iphone-experience-not-features.html/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackberry Storm vs. iPhone: Similar Experience or Disaster? : Dale Larson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailylarson.com/?p=14#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] The reviews bear out what I said in May: Overall user experience, not touchscreen or features make the iPhone a winner vs. Blackberry Storm. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The reviews bear out what I said in May: Overall user experience, not touchscreen or features make the iPhone a winner vs. Blackberry Storm. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

